Rought v. Henderson
This text of 228 So. 2d 483 (Rought v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In re: Andrew Rought applying for writs of certiorari and habeas corpus.
The application is denied. The showing made does not warrant the exercise of our supervisory or original jurisdiction in this case.
is of the opinion that the application and returns warrant the ordering of a hearing on the application for writ of habeas corpus. No counsel at arraignment (reflected in minutes) allegation that counsel was not seen until day of trial, and record reflecting a denial of a motion to suppress as being untimely filed require a hearing for the determination of the merits of the application.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
228 So. 2d 483, 254 La. 925, 1969 La. LEXIS 3269, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rought-v-henderson-la-1969.