Roughlands Realty Corp. v. Bridgman

184 Misc. 309, 53 N.Y.S.2d 79, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2856
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 26, 1945·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Memorandum Per Curiam.

The parties litigated the issues raised by the fourth cause of action before the Office of Price Administration and the plaintiff complied with the ruling against it. The same issues, therefore, may not be relitigated in the State court. The first three causes of action are sufficient as matter of law.

The order should be modified by dismissing the fourth cause of action, and as modified affirmed, with leave to defendant to answer within five days after service of order entered hereon.

Hammeb, Shientag and Hecht, JJ., concur.

Ordered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roughlands Realty Corp. v. Bridgman, 184 Misc. 309, 53 N.Y.S.2d 79, 1945 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2856 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1945).

184 Misc. 309 (Roughlands Realty Corp. v. Bridgman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Hyong Jin Kim
15 B.R. 198 (S.D. New York, 1981)