Rough v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

District Court, E.D. California·Decided November 18, 2020·No. 2:19-cv-01340·Unknown

Opinion

SEYFARTH SHAW LLP 1 David D. Kadue (SBN 113578) 2 dkadue@seyfarth.com David D. Jacobson (SBN 143369) 3 djacobson@seyfarth.com Jinouth D. Vasquez Santos (SBN 299056) 4 jvasquezsantos@seyfarth.com 2029 Century Park East, Suite 3500 5 Los Angeles, California 90067-3021 6 Telephone: (310) 277-7200 Facsimile: (310) 201-5219 7 Attorneys for Defendant COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION 8 GRAHAMHOLLIS APC 9 Graham S.P. Hollis (SBN 120577) 10 ghollis@grahamhollis.com Nathan Reese (SBN 283150) 11 nreese@grahamhollis.com 3555 Fifth Avenue, Suite 200 12 San Diego, California 92103 Telephone: 619.692.0800 13 Facsimile: 619.692.0822 14 Attorneys for Plaintiff MEGAN ROUGH 15 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 16 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 17

18 MEGAN ROUGH, individually and on behalf of all similarly situated current and former No. 2:19-cv-01340-MCE-DB 19 employees of DEFENDANTS in the State of California, STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR STANDARD LITIGATION 20 Plaintiff, 21 v. 22 COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, a 23 D ine cl la uw sia vr ee , Corporation, and DOES 1-50, 24 Defendant. 25 26

27 1 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 3 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 4 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, 5 the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective 6 Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all disclosures 7 or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and use extends 8 only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under the 9 applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that 10 this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; 11 Civil Local Rule 141 sets forth the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be 12 applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 13 2. DEFINITIONS 14 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of information or 15 items under this Order. 16 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 17 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of 18 Civil Procedure 26(c). 19 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well 20 as their support staff). 21 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 22 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 23 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium 24 or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 25 transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 26 discovery in this matter. 27 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 1 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 2 consultant in this action. 3 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House 4 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 5 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 6 entity not named as a Party to this action. 7 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action 8 but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on 9 behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 10 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 11 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 12 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 13 Material in this action. 14 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 15 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, 16 storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 17 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 18 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 19 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 20 Producing Party. 21 3. SCOPE 22 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material (as 23 defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all 24 copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 25 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 26 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 27 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving 1 Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of 2 publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record 3 through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the disclosure 4 or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the information 5 lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of Protected 6 Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 7 4. DURATION 8 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 9 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 10 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and 11 defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion 12 and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the time 13 limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 14 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 15 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or 16 Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to limit 17 any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The 18 Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or oral 19 or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, items, or 20 communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within the ambit of 21 this Order. 22 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown 23 to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily 24 encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens on 25 other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions. 26 If it comes to a Designating Party’s attention that information or items that it designated for protection 27 do not qualify for protection, that Designating Party must promptly notify all other Parties that it is 1 withdrawing the mistaken designation. 2 5.2 Manner and Timing of Designations.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rough v. Costco Wholesale Corp., (E.D. Cal. 2020).

Rough v. Costco Wholesale Corp. (Rough v. Costco Wholesale Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kamakana v. City and County of Honolulu
447 F.3d 1172 (Ninth Circuit, 2006)
Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLC
809 F.3d 1092 (Ninth Circuit, 2016)