Rough & Ready Lumber Co. v. Hartnell
This text of 34 P.3d 734 (Rough & Ready Lumber Co. v. Hartnell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff, the prevailing party, sought recovery of its portion of the neutral’s fee for participating in the Court of Appeals’ settlement program. We hold that a prevailing party is not entitled to recover its portion of the neutral’s fee.
This case was assigned to the court’s Appellate Settlement Conference Program. See generally ORAP 15. ORAP 15.05(7)(a) requires the parties to equally share the neutral’s fee. The settlement conference was unsuccessful. The case was briefed to the court, and plaintiff prevailed and was designated the prevailing party, entitling it to costs and disbursements. Rough & Ready Lumber Co. v. Hartnell, 175 Or App 291, 27 P3d 536 (2001). Plaintiff included its share of the neutral’s fee in its attorney fee petition. Defendant objected.1
There is no statutory authority for a party to recover its portion of the Appellate Settlement Conference Program neutral’s fee from an adverse party. See Willamette Prod. Credit v. Borg-Warner Acceptance, 75 Or App 154, 706 P2d 577, rev den 300 Or 477 (1985). Plaintiff is not entitled to recover its portion of the neutral’s fee.
Petition for attorney fees allowed in the sum of $11,077.70.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
34 P.3d 734, 177 Or. App. 713, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 1628, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rough-ready-lumber-co-v-hartnell-orctapp-2001.