Roudner v. MacKenzie

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Roudner v. MacKenzie

536 So. 2d 299, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2695, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5413, 1988 WL 131701

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 13, 1988

DocketNo. 88-2623

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 536 So. 2d 299 (Roudner v. MacKenzie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roudner v. MacKenzie, 536 So. 2d 299, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2695, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5413, 1988 WL 131701 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On moving papers that were legally sufficient, the petitioners sought to disqualify the respondent judge from presiding over non-jury commercial litigation pending in the trial court below. The petitioners’ attorney in the pending matter is the daughter of the incumbent circuit judge who defeated the respondent judge’s husband in a recent election. These facts are sufficient to have warranted the respondent judge’s entering an order of recusal. See Caleffe v. Vitale, 488 So.2d 627 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).. See also Breakstone v. The Honorable Mary Ann MacKenzie, No. 88-2392 (Fla. 3d DCA Nov. 29,1988). We are confident that the respondent judge will enter an order of recusal, and, accordingly, we withhold formal issuance of our writ of prohibition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

On moving papers that were legally sufficient, the petitioners sought to disqualify the respondent judge from presiding over non-jury commercial litigation pending in the trial court below. The petitioners’ attorney in the pending matter is the daughter of the incumbent circuit judge who defeated the respondent judge’s husband in a recent election. These facts are sufficient to have warranted the respondent judge’s entering an order of recusal. See Caleffe v. Vitale, 488 So.2d 627 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).. See also Breakstone v. The Honorable Mary Ann MacKenzie, No. 88-2392 (Fla. 3d DCA Nov. 29,1988). We are confident that the respondent judge will enter an order of recusal, and, accordingly, we withhold formal issuance of our writ of prohibition.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

536 So. 2d 299, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 2695, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 5413, 1988 WL 131701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roudner-v-mackenzie-fladistctapp-1988.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack