Roudette v. Roudette

158 A.D.2d 280, 551 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 887

This text of 158 A.D.2d 280 (Roudette v. Roudette) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roudette v. Roudette, 158 A.D.2d 280, 551 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 887 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

No direct appeal lies from an ex parte order. (Matter of McKee v Coughlin, 142 AD2d 798; Siegel, NY Prac § 524, at 719.) Were we to reach the merits, we would affirm the order directing defendant’s eviction from the condominium unit as necessary to effectuate the previously ordered sale of the unit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Asch, Kassal, Smith and Rubin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McKee v. Coughlin
142 A.D.2d 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
158 A.D.2d 280, 551 N.Y.S.2d 819, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 887, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roudette-v-roudette-nyappdiv-1990.