Roudabush v. Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided June 18, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2012-0122·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

___________________________________ ) JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-0122 (RLW) ) GREYHOUND BUS LINES, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ___________________________________ )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

On March 28, 2012, the defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint. Because a

ruling on the motion to dismiss potentially could dispose of this case, in its April 11, 2012 Order,

the Court advised the plaintiff, among other things, of his obligation to file an opposition or other

response to the motion. Further, that Order expressly warned the plaintiff that, if he failed to file

his opposition by April 30, 2012, the Court would treat the motion as conceded. The Court

subsequently extended the plaintiff’s filing deadline to June 8, 2012. To date, the plaintiff

neither has filed an opposition nor requested additional time to do so. The Court will treat the

defendants’ motion as conceded and dismiss the case.

An Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

SO ORDERED.

Digitally signed by Judge Robert L. Wilkins DN: cn=Judge Robert L. Wilkins, o=U.S. District Court, ou=Chambers of Honorable Robert L. Wilkins, email=RW@dc.uscourt.gov, c=US Date: 2012.06.18 09:30:45 -04'00'

DATE: June 18, 2012 ROBERT L. WILKINS United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roudabush v. Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc., (D.D.C. 2012).

Roudabush v. Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc. (Roudabush v. Greyhound Bus Lines, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.