Roudabush, Jr. v. Grimes

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided August 14, 2012·No. Civil Action No. 2012-0063·Published

Opinion

UNITED sTATEs DISTR1CT C0URT F I L E D FoR THE I)ISTR1CT oF C0LUMB1A Aus 1 4 mg

C|erk, U.S. District & Bankruptcy

JAMES LESTER ROUDABUSH, JR., ) Courts for the District of C@iumb;a Plaintiff, § v_ § Civil Action No. 12-63 P. GRIMES, et al., g Defendants. §

MEMORANDUM OPINION

The Court has allowed the above-captioned action to be provisionally filed. Before the

Court would consider the plaintiff’ s complaint and application to proceed in forma pauperis, the plaintiff was directed to submit a certified copy of his trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent), including the supporting ledger sheets, for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this complaint, obtained from the appropriate official of each prison at which plaintiff is or was confined. 28 U.S.C. § l9l5(a)(2). Although plaintiff has submitted a change of address, he has filed response to the Court’s Order. Accordingly, the

Court will dismiss the complaint and this action. An Order accompanies this Memorandum

zru<~ /€/~»WT~

United States District Judge

Opinion.

DATE; W/ v /,,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roudabush, Jr. v. Grimes, (D.D.C. 2012).

Roudabush, Jr. v. Grimes (Roudabush, Jr. v. Grimes) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.