Roucchio v. New York State Division of Parole

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roucchio v. New York State Division of Parole

199 A.D.2d 811, 608 N.Y.S.2d 122, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12221

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 23, 1993

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 199 A.D.2d 811 (Roucchio v. New York State Division of Parole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roucchio v. New York State Division of Parole, 199 A.D.2d 811, 608 N.Y.S.2d 122, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12221 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ryan, Jr., J.), entered May 28, 1993 in Franklin County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondents which, inter alia, denied petitioner’s request for release on parole.

We reject petitioner’s argument that respondents failed to consider all relevant factors and set forth sufficient reasons for the denial of petitioner’s request for parole. The record indicates that respondents acted properly and in accordance with statutory requirements. Finally, we conclude that it was [812]*812not an abuse of discretion in this case for respondents to impose a 24-month hold before petitioner can again be considered for parole.

Weiss, P. J., Cardona, White, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Ryan, Jr., J.), entered May 28, 1993 in Franklin County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, to review a determination of respondents which, inter alia, denied petitioner’s request for release on parole.

We reject petitioner’s argument that respondents failed to consider all relevant factors and set forth sufficient reasons for the denial of petitioner’s request for parole. The record indicates that respondents acted properly and in accordance with statutory requirements. Finally, we conclude that it was [812]*812not an abuse of discretion in this case for respondents to impose a 24-month hold before petitioner can again be considered for parole.

Weiss, P. J., Cardona, White, Mahoney and Casey, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

199 A.D.2d 811, 608 N.Y.S.2d 122, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12221, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roucchio-v-new-york-state-division-of-parole-nyappdiv-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack