Roucanos v. De Mizio

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Roucanos v. De Mizio

116 R.I. 937

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedMay 20, 1976

DocketAppeal No. 75-327

StatusPublished

This text of 116 R.I. 937 (Roucanos v. De Mizio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roucanos v. De Mizio, 116 R.I. 937 (R.I. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal of plaintiffs is based on an alleged error in the instructions to the jury. The plaintiffs neither objected to those instructions nor requested contrary ones. Absent such request or objection, they are foreclosed from challenging the instructions given, DeSimone v. Manzi, 114 R. I. 30, 327 A.2d 840 (1974). See also Super. R. Civ. P., 51(b). Accordingly, the defendants’ motion to affirm the judgment below pursuant to Rule 16(g) is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal of plaintiffs is based on an alleged error in the instructions to the jury. The plaintiffs neither objected to those instructions nor requested contrary ones. Absent such request or objection, they are foreclosed from challenging the instructions given, DeSimone v. Manzi, 114 R. I. 30, 327 A.2d 840 (1974). See also Super. R. Civ. P., 51(b). Accordingly, the defendants’ motion to affirm the judgment below pursuant to Rule 16(g) is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

116 R.I. 937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roucanos-v-de-mizio-ri-1976.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack