Roucanos v. De Mizio

116 R.I. 937
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided May 20, 1976·No. Appeal No. 75-327·Published

Opinion

Appeal of plaintiffs is based on an alleged error in the instructions to the jury. The plaintiffs neither objected to those instructions nor requested contrary ones. Absent such request or objection, they are foreclosed from challenging the instructions given, DeSimone v. Manzi, 114 R. I. 30, 327 A.2d 840 (1974). See also Super. R. Civ. P., 51(b). Accordingly, the defendants’ motion to affirm the judgment below pursuant to Rule 16(g) is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roucanos v. De Mizio, 116 R.I. 937 (R.I. 1976).

116 R.I. 937 (Roucanos v. De Mizio) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DeSimone v. Manzi
327 A.2d 840 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1974)