Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. Ceppos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. Ceppos

58 A.D.2d 537, 396 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12519

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 16, 1977

StatusPublished

This text of 58 A.D.2d 537 (Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. Ceppos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. Ceppos, 58 A.D.2d 537, 396 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12519 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 19, 1977, unanimously reversed, on the law, and plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment denied, with $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal to appellants. The notes in suit bear the signature of an individual defendant, naked of designation, above which is a corporate name. Further, the plural pronoun "we” is used to designate the maker. Thus a question of fact is inherent on the face of each note as to who is liable for payment. Concur —Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Evans, Capozzoli and Markewich, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 19, 1977, unanimously reversed, on the law, and plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment denied, with $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal to appellants. The notes in suit bear the signature of an individual defendant, naked of designation, above which is a corporate name. Further, the plural pronoun "we” is used to designate the maker. Thus a question of fact is inherent on the face of each note as to who is liable for payment. Concur —Murphy, P. J., Lupiano, Evans, Capozzoli and Markewich, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

58 A.D.2d 537, 396 N.Y.S.2d 1, 1977 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rotuba-extruders-inc-v-ceppos-nyappdiv-1977.