ROTTENBERG, ETA v. CLARKE, WAYNE
This text of ROTTENBERG, ETA v. CLARKE, WAYNE (ROTTENBERG, ETA v. CLARKE, WAYNE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department
805 CAF 15-00036 PRESENT: SMITH, J.P., CARNI, LINDLEY, DEJOSEPH, AND SCUDDER, JJ.
IN THE MATTER OF ETA ROTTENBERG, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
WAYNE CLARKE, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT. (APPEAL NO. 2.)
WAYNE CLARKE, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT PRO SE.
SHEILA SULLIVAN DICKINSON, ATTORNEY FOR THE CHILD, MIDDLESEX.
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Erie County (Kevin M. Carter, J.), entered March 13, 2014 in a proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6. The order restrained respondent from injurious actions with respect to the subject child.
It is hereby ORDERED that said appeal is unanimously dismissed without costs.
Same memorandum as in Matter of Rottenberg v Clarke ([appeal No. 1] ___ AD3d ___ [Nov. 18, 2016]).
Entered: November 18, 2016 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
ROTTENBERG, ETA v. CLARKE, WAYNE, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rottenberg-eta-v-clarke-wayne-nyappdiv-2016.