Rotondo v. Greene
This text of 343 So. 2d 671 (Rotondo v. Greene) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal presents the question of whether, on a motion for costs filed by a defendant who has been voluntarily dismissed from an action for damages for personal injuries, it is proper for the court to include, in the costs allowed, the dismissed defendants’ attorney’s fee as was done in this case. The ruling of the trial court charging the plaintiff with said defendants’ attorney’s fee as costs is hereby reversed on the authority of Campbell v. Maze, 339 So.2d 202 (Fla.1976), recently decided by the Supreme Court of Florida. It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
343 So. 2d 671, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 15490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rotondo-v-greene-fladistctapp-1977.