Roton Barrier, Inc., and Austin R. Baer v. The Stanley Works

95 F.3d 1164, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40953, 1996 WL 428223
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Roton Barrier, Inc., and Austin R. Baer v. The Stanley Works. Read the opinion of the Court — 79 F.3d 1112
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided July 19, 1996·No. 95-1519·Unpublished

Opinion

95 F.3d 1164

NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
ROTON BARRIER, INC., and Austin R. Baer, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
v.
THE STANLEY WORKS, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 95-1519.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

July 19, 1996.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

ORDER

The parties having so agreed, it is ORDERED that the proceeding is DISMISSED under Fed.R.App.P. 42(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roton Barrier, Inc., and Austin R. Baer v. The Stanley Works, 95 F.3d 1164, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 40953, 1996 WL 428223 (Fed. Cir. 1996).

95 F.3d 1164 (Roton Barrier, Inc., and Austin R. Baer v. The Stanley Works) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.