Rotolante v. DOR
This text of Rotolante v. DOR (Rotolante v. DOR) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
JOEL ROTOLANTE,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D17-715
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE O/B/O DENISE ROTOLANTE,
Appellee. /
Opinion filed August 18, 2017
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Brevard County, Charles J. Roberts, Judge.
Elizabeth Siano Harris, of Widerman Malek, PL, Melbourne, for Appellant.
Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Toni C. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.
ON CONCESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
Based on the Department of Revenue’s proper concession of error, we reverse
the trial court’s “Final Order of Contempt on Report and Recommendation of the Hearing
Officer – Granted – Commitment.” We also quash the trial court’s April 3, 2017, Order
Modifying Final Order of Contempt on Report and Recommendation, which the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter during the pendency of this appeal.
REVERSED and REMANDED.
SAWAYA, LAMBERT, and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Rotolante v. DOR, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rotolante-v-dor-fladistctapp-2017.