Rotolante v. Dasilva
This text of 460 So. 2d 560 (Rotolante v. Dasilva) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The appellant is the owner of real property upon which her lessee operates a boarding stable for horses, and from which a horse which was neither owned nor controlled by the appellant wandered onto a public road causing damage to the appellee. The judgment against the appellant is reversed with directions to enter judgment in her favor upon a holding that the owner of land, who neither owns nor has custody or control of any livestock on the property, has no duty to erect or maintain a fence upon the land. Davidson v. Howard, 438 So.2d 899 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983), rev. denied, 450 So.2d 486 (Fla.1984).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
460 So. 2d 560, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 92, 1984 Fla. App. LEXIS 16103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rotolante-v-dasilva-fladistctapp-1984.