Rothweiler v. Rothweiler

Missouri Court of Appeals

Rothweiler v. Rothweiler

350 S.W.3d 97, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1319, 2011 WL 4862953

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 11, 2011

DocketED 95996

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 350 S.W.3d 97 (Rothweiler v. Rothweiler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rothweiler v. Rothweiler, 350 S.W.3d 97, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1319, 2011 WL 4862953 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bryan Lee Rothweiler appeals the judgment dissolving his marriage to Linda Irene Rothweiler. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its award of maintenance, its division of property, or its award of attorney’s fees.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bryan Lee Rothweiler appeals the judgment dissolving his marriage to Linda Irene Rothweiler. We find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in its award of maintenance, its division of property, or its award of attorney’s fees.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

350 S.W.3d 97, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1319, 2011 WL 4862953, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothweiler-v-rothweiler-moctapp-2011.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack