Rothstein v. Trantino

625 A.2d 1377, 226 Conn. 906, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 180
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 26, 1993
DocketSC 14790
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 625 A.2d 1377 (Rothstein v. Trantino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rothstein v. Trantino, 625 A.2d 1377, 226 Conn. 906, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 180 (Colo. 1993).

Opinion

The defendant Joseph P. Trantino’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, (AC 11795), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Where a defendant appeals from a judgment of strict foreclosure and the trial court terminates the automatic stay pending appeal, may the Appellate Court lawfully dismiss the appeal as moot if the law day set by the trial court passes prior to the Appellate Court’s deciding the appeal?

[907]*907The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14790. Jeremiah Donovan, in support of the petition. Lloyd L. Langhammer, in opposition. Decided May 26, 1993

“2. Are due process of law and the statutory right to appeal violated by a trial court’s ordering of a strict foreclosure, terminating the automatic stay pending appeal, and setting a law day prior to the time that the Appellate Court can decide the appeal, thus denying the defendant any opportunity for appellate review of the trial court’s judgment of strict foreclosure?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rothstein v. Trantino
635 A.2d 813 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
625 A.2d 1377, 226 Conn. 906, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothstein-v-trantino-conn-1993.