Rothstein v. Passidomo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rothstein v. Passidomo

47 A.D.2d 523, 363 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8579

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 6, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 523 (Rothstein v. Passidomo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rothstein v. Passidomo, 47 A.D.2d 523, 363 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8579 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR and section 2-210 of the Village Law to review a determination of the respondent Supervisor of the Town of Harrison upholding the legal sufficiency of a petition to incorporate the Town of Harrison as the Village of Harrison, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 23, 1974, which dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, with costs. We agree with Special Term’s conclusion that the rulings and findings of the town supervisor were not arbitrary and capricious or contrary to law. We have also reviewed the record and found that the determination that the petition for village incorporation was legally sufficient was supported by substantial evidence. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Cohalan, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to article 78 of the CPLR and section 2-210 of the Village Law to review a determination of the respondent Supervisor of the Town of Harrison upholding the legal sufficiency of a petition to incorporate the Town of Harrison as the Village of Harrison, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Westchester County, entered September 23, 1974, which dismissed the proceeding. Judgment affirmed, with costs. We agree with Special Term’s conclusion that the rulings and findings of the town supervisor were not arbitrary and capricious or contrary to law. We have also reviewed the record and found that the determination that the petition for village incorporation was legally sufficient was supported by substantial evidence. Gulotta, P. J., Hopkins, Cohalan, Christ and Munder, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 523, 363 N.Y.S.2d 909, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothstein-v-passidomo-nyappdiv-1975.