Rothstein v. County Operating Corp.

158 N.E.2d 507, 6 N.Y.2d 728, 185 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1456
New York Court of Appeals·Decided April 9, 1959·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Order affirmed, with costs. In making determinations upon applications for special exceptions under the Zoning Ordinance, the Town Board exercises judgment or discretion of a character which is reviewable as to reasonableness in a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act (Matter of Lerner v. Young, 286 App. Div. 1109, motion for leave to appeal denied 309 N. Y. 1035; Matter of Frantellizzi v. Herman, 1 A D 2d 980, motion for leave to appeal granted [but appeal not prosecuted] 1 N Y 2d 643). No opinion.

Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel, Van Voorhis and Burke.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rothstein v. County Operating Corp., 158 N.E.2d 507, 6 N.Y.2d 728, 185 N.Y.S.2d 813, 1959 N.Y. LEXIS 1456 (N.Y. 1959).

158 N.E.2d 507 (Rothstein v. County Operating Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Altaire Builders, Inc. v. Village of Horseheads
551 F. Supp. 1066 (W.D. New York, 1982)
Bailey v. Smith
75 A.D.2d 573 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Kinderhill Farm Breeding Associates v. Appel
450 F. Supp. 134 (S.D. New York, 1978)
First Westminster Presbyterian Church v. City Council
57 A.D.2d 556 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1977)