Rothschild v. Ignition Electric Service Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rothschild v. Ignition Electric Service Corp.

232 A.D. 692

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1931

StatusPublished

This text of 232 A.D. 692 (Rothschild v. Ignition Electric Service Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rothschild v. Ignition Electric Service Corp., 232 A.D. 692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Order requiring plaintiffs’ examination before trial modified by striking out the portion thereof requiring plaintiffs’ attendance at the county court house in White Plains and substituting in place thereof a requirement that plaintiffs’ depositions shall be taken by written interrogatories under a commission, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, there is no necessity for requiring the plaintiffs’ attendance at White Plains for the examination. The purpose of the examination can be as well obtained by a commission. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, [693]*693Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice as to the terms of the commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order requiring plaintiffs’ examination before trial modified by striking out the portion thereof requiring plaintiffs’ attendance at the county court house in White Plains and substituting in place thereof a requirement that plaintiffs’ depositions shall be taken by written interrogatories under a commission, and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. In our opinion, there is no necessity for requiring the plaintiffs’ attendance at White Plains for the examination. The purpose of the examination can be as well obtained by a commission. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, [693]*693Carswell and Tompkins, JJ., concur. Settle order on notice as to the terms of the commission.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

232 A.D. 692, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothschild-v-ignition-electric-service-corp-nyappdiv-1931.