Rothschild v. Gianelli

California Court of Appeal

Rothschild v. Gianelli

280 P. 562, 100 Cal. App. 799, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 396

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedSeptember 17, 1929

DocketDocket No. 3804.

StatusPublished

This text of 280 P. 562 (Rothschild v. Gianelli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rothschild v. Gianelli, 280 P. 562, 100 Cal. App. 799, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 396 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is an action to recover from the defendants on their alleged liability as stockholders of the Joe Gianelli Company, a corporation, for debts incurred by the *800 corporation since the death of Guisseppe Gianelli, who owned nine hundred shares of the capital stock of the corporation. The demurrers of the defendants Joe Gianelli, Jr., B.. R. Gianelli, Louiga Gianelli and Louisa Gianelli, as executrix of the last will of Guisseppe Gianelli, deceased, were overruled. The demurrers of the other defendants were sustained without leave to amend and judgment was thereupon entered in favor of such defendants. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment.

The facts relating to the liability of the defendants are in all respects the same as those in the case of Meilink against the same defendants (Civ. No. 3803, ante, p. 615 [280 Pac. 561]), this day decided by this court.

On the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on October 17, 1929, and a petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on November 14, 1929.

All the Justices concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

THE COURT.

This is an action to recover from the defendants on their alleged liability as stockholders of the Joe Gianelli Company, a corporation, for debts incurred by the *800 corporation since the death of Guisseppe Gianelli, who owned nine hundred shares of the capital stock of the corporation. The demurrers of the defendants Joe Gianelli, Jr., B.. R. Gianelli, Louiga Gianelli and Louisa Gianelli, as executrix of the last will of Guisseppe Gianelli, deceased, were overruled. The demurrers of the other defendants were sustained without leave to amend and judgment was thereupon entered in favor of such defendants. The plaintiff has appealed from the judgment.

The facts relating to the liability of the defendants are in all respects the same as those in the case of Meilink against the same defendants (Civ. No. 3803, ante, p. 615 [280 Pac. 561]), this day decided by this court.

On the authority of that case, the judgment is affirmed.

A petition for a rehearing of this cause was denied by the District Court of Appeal on October 17, 1929, and a petition by appellant to have the cause heard in the Supreme Court, after judgment in the District Court of Appeal, was denied by the Supreme Court on November 14, 1929.

All the Justices concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

280 P. 562, 100 Cal. App. 799, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothschild-v-gianelli-calctapp-1929.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack