Rothschild v. Chemacid Societe Anonyme

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Rothschild v. Chemacid Societe Anonyme

264 A.D. 796, 35 N.Y.S.2d 205, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4765

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 25, 1942

StatusPublished

This text of 264 A.D. 796 (Rothschild v. Chemacid Societe Anonyme) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rothschild v. Chemacid Societe Anonyme, 264 A.D. 796, 35 N.Y.S.2d 205, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4765 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action brought by stockholders on behalf of a corporation, order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss certain portions of the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute recoverable claims, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The record is insufficient to decide the contention raised with respect to failure to plead the foreign law, and by this decision that contention is left open and undecided. On the facts presently appearing, the complaint states a cause of action based on acts committed within the jurisdiction. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action brought by stockholders on behalf of a corporation, order denying appellants’ motion to dismiss certain portions of the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute recoverable claims, in so far as appealed from, affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The record is insufficient to decide the contention raised with respect to failure to plead the foreign law, and by this decision that contention is left open and undecided. On the facts presently appearing, the complaint states a cause of action based on acts committed within the jurisdiction. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 A.D. 796, 35 N.Y.S.2d 205, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4765, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothschild-v-chemacid-societe-anonyme-nyappdiv-1942.