Rothschild v. Board of Education
This text of 168 A.D. 936 (Rothschild v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide event. Held, that for the purposes of the motion for judgment, the allegations of the complaint as to the corporate existence of defendant were controlling and such corporate existence must be presumed in the determination of the motion. All concurred, except Kruse, P. J., and Merrell, J., who dissented.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
168 A.D. 936, 153 N.Y.S. 1141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothschild-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1915.