Rothrock v. Rothrock Motor Sales, Inc.
This text of 833 A.2d 138 (Rothrock v. Rothrock Motor Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2003, the above-listed petition for allowance of appeal is GRANTED. The parties are directed to address the following questions:
1) Whether the Superior Court erred in creating a new exception to the at-will employment doctrine.
2). Whether the Superior Court erred in retroactively applying Shick v. Shirey, 552 Pa. 590, 716 A.2d 1231 (1998) to this matter. In addressing this issue, the parties are directed to consider what effect, if any, Harper v. Virginia Dept. of Taxation, 509 U.S. 86, 113 S.Ct. 2510, 125 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993) has on our line of cases arising out of Schreiber v. Republic Intermodal Corp., 473 Pa. 614, 375 A.2d 1285 (1977).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
833 A.2d 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothrock-v-rothrock-motor-sales-inc-pa-2003.