Rothrock v. Rothrock Motor Sales, Inc.

833 A.2d 138
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedOctober 2, 2003
StatusPublished

This text of 833 A.2d 138 (Rothrock v. Rothrock Motor Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rothrock v. Rothrock Motor Sales, Inc., 833 A.2d 138 (Pa. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 2nd day of October, 2003, the above-listed petition for allowance of appeal is GRANTED. The parties are directed to address the following questions:

1) Whether the Superior Court erred in creating a new exception to the at-will employment doctrine.

2). Whether the Superior Court erred in retroactively applying Shick v. Shirey, 552 Pa. 590, 716 A.2d 1231 (1998) to this matter. In addressing this issue, the parties are directed to consider what effect, if any, Harper v. Virginia Dept. of Taxation, 509 U.S. 86, 113 S.Ct. 2510, 125 L.Ed.2d 74 (1993) has on our line of cases arising out of Schreiber v. Republic Intermodal Corp., 473 Pa. 614, 375 A.2d 1285 (1977).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Harper v. Virginia Department of Taxation
509 U.S. 86 (Supreme Court, 1993)
Shick v. Shirey
716 A.2d 1231 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1998)
Schreiber v. Republic Intermodal Corp.
375 A.2d 1285 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
833 A.2d 138, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothrock-v-rothrock-motor-sales-inc-pa-2003.