Rothrock v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.

103 A. 918, 260 Pa. 463, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 548
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedMarch 4, 1918
DocketAppeal, No. 277
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 103 A. 918 (Rothrock v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rothrock v. Lehigh Valley Transit Co., 103 A. 918, 260 Pa. 463, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 548 (Pa. 1918).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The injuries for which the plaintiff seeks compensation in this action were sustained in a collision at a public road crossing. He was riding in an automobile when, according to the testimony, a car of the defendant company approached the crossing at a speed of from thirty-five to forty miles an hour, without giving any warning of its approach. The plaintiff testified that he approached the trolley track at very low speed; that he had a view along the track for one hundred and eighty or one hundred and ninety feet in the direction from which the car came; that he looked in that direction and neither saw nor heard it coming; that when his automobile was close to the track he saw the car for the first time coming towards him, at great speed, and it was impossible for him to stop his automobile before getting upon the track. The testimony clearly called for a submission of the case to the jury on the questions of the defendant’s negligence and the contributory negligence of the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
87 Pa. Super. 273 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
103 A. 918, 260 Pa. 463, 1918 Pa. LEXIS 548, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothrock-v-lehigh-valley-transit-co-pa-1918.