Rothman v. Gold Master Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Rothman v. Gold Master Corp.

323 So. 2d 586, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18938

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 28, 1975·No. No. 75-267·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the second appearance of this case before this court. Our prior decision of Fla.App., 287 So.2d 735 held that the complaint stated a cause of action. This appeal is from a summary final judgment in which the court held that the facts properly before it showed that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the defendant was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. The trial judge’s decision is amply supported by the law as stated in Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., Fla.1956, 89 So.2d 482.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is the second appearance of this case before this court. Our prior decision of Fla.App., 287 So.2d 735 held that the complaint stated a cause of action. This appeal is from a summary final judgment in which the court held that the facts properly before it showed that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the defendant was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. The trial judge’s decision is amply supported by the law as stated in Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., Fla.1956, 89 So.2d 482.

Affirmed.

Rothman v. Gold Master Corp., 323 So. 2d 586, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18938 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

323 So. 2d 586 (Rothman v. Gold Master Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related