Rothman v. Gold Master Corp.
This text of 323 So. 2d 586 (Rothman v. Gold Master Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is the second appearance of this case before this court. Our prior decision of Fla.App., 287 So.2d 735 held that the complaint stated a cause of action. This appeal is from a summary final judgment in which the court held that the facts properly before it showed that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the defendant was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. The trial judge’s decision is amply supported by the law as stated in Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., Fla.1956, 89 So.2d 482.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
323 So. 2d 586, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothman-v-gold-master-corp-fladistctapp-1975.