Rothman v. Gold Master Corp.

323 So. 2d 586, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18938
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 28, 1975
DocketNo. 75-267
StatusPublished

This text of 323 So. 2d 586 (Rothman v. Gold Master Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rothman v. Gold Master Corp., 323 So. 2d 586, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18938 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is the second appearance of this case before this court. Our prior decision of Fla.App., 287 So.2d 735 held that the complaint stated a cause of action. This appeal is from a summary final judgment in which the court held that the facts properly before it showed that there was no genuine issue of material fact and that the defendant was entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. The trial judge’s decision is amply supported by the law as stated in Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., Fla.1956, 89 So.2d 482.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rothman v. GOLD MASTER CORPORATION
287 So. 2d 735 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1974)
Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc.
89 So. 2d 482 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
323 So. 2d 586, 1975 Fla. App. LEXIS 18938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothman-v-gold-master-corp-fladistctapp-1975.