Rothman v. Estate of Rosenberg
152 N.E.2d 521, 4 N.Y.2d 969
This text of 152 N.E.2d 521 (Rothman v. Estate of Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rothman v. Estate of Rosenberg, 152 N.E.2d 521, 4 N.Y.2d 969 (N.Y. 1958).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Chief Judge Conway and Judges Desmond, Dye, Fuld, Froessel and Burke. Judge Van Voorhis dissents and votes to reverse and to dismiss the complaints upon the ground that the physical facts and circumstances of the accident render its occurrence in the manner claimed by the plaintiffs incredible as a matter of law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
152 N.E.2d 521, 4 N.Y.2d 969, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothman-v-estate-of-rosenberg-ny-1958.