Rothmaher v. Wragg
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 397
Opinion
Ordered that the Defendant Samuel Wragg Esq. do put in his Answer to [398]*398the Complainants Bill of Complaint in Eight days after Service of this Rule.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rothmaher v. Wragg, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 397 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1743).
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 397 (Rothmaher v. Wragg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.