Rothmaher v. Wragg
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 397
This text of 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 397 (Rothmaher v. Wragg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Chancery of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rothmaher v. Wragg, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 397 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1743).
Opinion
Ordered that the Defendant Samuel Wragg Esq. do put in his Answer to [398]*398the Complainants Bill of Complaint in Eight days after Service of this Rule.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 397, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothmaher-v-wragg-ctchansc-1743.