Rothleutner v. Bateman

Supreme Court of Georgia

Rothleutner v. Bateman

86 S.E. 215, 144 Ga. 103, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 73

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedSeptember 17, 1915

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 86 S.E. 215 (Rothleutner v. Bateman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rothleutner v. Bateman, 86 S.E. 215, 144 Ga. 103, 1915 Ga. LEXIS 73 (Ga. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Beck, J.

1. All applications for continuances are addressed to the sound discretion of the court. And it not appearing that the discretion of the trial court in refusing a continuance in the instant case was abused, the exception to the denial of a new trial because of such refusal is without merit.

2. As is recognized by the plaintiff in error and shown by the bill of ex[104]*104ceptions, tlie adverse ruling upon the motion for a continuance is controlling; and that ruling having been sustained, the judgment of the court below is

September 17, 1915.

Action for damages. Before Judge Ellis.. Fulton superior court. June 26, 1914.

Anderson & Anderson and P. B. D’Orr, for plaintiff. George Westmoreland, for defendant.

Affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, O. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI