Rothgeb v. Cunningham
203 P. 956, 118 Wash. 701, 1922 Wash. LEXIS 667
Opinion
— The controlling facts in these cases, numbers 16717, 16718 and 16719, are essentially the same as the facts in the cases of Birge and others against Cunningham, ante p. 458, 203 Pac. 954. For the reasons stated in the opinion in those cases, the judgment in each of these cases is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rothgeb v. Cunningham, 203 P. 956, 118 Wash. 701, 1922 Wash. LEXIS 667 (Wash. 1922).
203 P. 956 (Rothgeb v. Cunningham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Birge v. Cunningham
203 P. 954 (Washington Supreme Court, 1922)