Rothermel v. H. C. Roulston, Inc.

238 A.D. 808

This text of 238 A.D. 808 (Rothermel v. H. C. Roulston, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rothermel v. H. C. Roulston, Inc., 238 A.D. 808 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Judgment and order unanimously affirmed, with costs. (Mieuli v. New York & Queens County R. Co., 136 App. Div. 373; Knapp v. Barrett, 216 N. Y. 226, 230.) Present — Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Carswell and Tompkins, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knapp v. . Barrett
110 N.E. 428 (New York Court of Appeals, 1915)
Mieuli v. New York & Queens County Railway Co.
136 A.D. 373 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
238 A.D. 808, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothermel-v-h-c-roulston-inc-nyappdiv-1933.