Rothenberg v. Hunter
This text of 22 A.D.2d 856 (Rothenberg v. Hunter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, entered on June 3, 1964 denying defendant’s motion to strike certain paragraphs of the complaint as prejudicial or in the alternative for partial summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, with $30 costs and disbursements to respondents. In thus- affirming the court does not pass upon the materiality of any of the allegations attacked or the admissibility of evidence offered thereunder. Concur — Breitel, J. P,, Valente, McNally, Eager and Steuer, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 A.D.2d 856, 254 N.Y.S.2d 807, 1964 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothenberg-v-hunter-nyappdiv-1964.