Rothe Development Corp. v. Dept. of Defense
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1565
ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,
Defendants-Appellees.
David F. Barton, The Gardner Law Firm, of San Antonio, Texas, argued for plaintiff- appellant.
Conor B. Dugan, Attorney, Appellate Section, Civil Rights Division, United States Department of Justice, of Washington, DC, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General, Mark L. Gross and Lisa Wilson Edwards, Attorneys.
Appealed from: United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
Judge Xavier Rodriguez NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit 2009-1565
ROTHE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE,
Defendants-Appellees.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
in CASE NO(S). 98-CV-1011
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MICHEL, Chief Judge, LOURIE and BRYSON, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED May 4, 2010 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Rothe Development Corp. v. Dept. of Defense (Rothe Development Corp. v. Dept. of Defense) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.