Rothchild v. . McNichol
This text of 28 S.E. 364 (Rothchild v. . McNichol) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The motion for the writ of certiorari must be denied. The petition is not verified as required by Rule 42, nor is the transcript of the record proper filed, nor good reason given for the failure to do so. Burrell v. Hughes, 120 N. C., 277, and cases cited; Brown v. House, 119 N. C., 622; Parker v. Railroad, at this term. Indeed no excuse is shown why the transcript of the whole record, including the case on *285 appeal, is not filed. The motion for certiorari must be denied, yet, as no motion to dismiss has been made, it can still be docketed at any time this Term, if before such, motion is made. Smith v. Montague, at this term; Triplett v. Foster, 113 N. C., 389. Indeed, if the cause was tried below since this Term began, it can be docketed regularly at next Term.
Motion denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
28 S.E. 364, 121 N.C. 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothchild-v-mcnichol-nc-1897.