Rothchild v. Abeles
162 A. 593, 109 N.J.L. 446, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 392
This text of 162 A. 593 (Rothchild v. Abeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Rothchild v. Abeles, 162 A. 593, 109 N.J.L. 446, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 392 (N.J. 1932).
Opinion
The judgment of the Supreme Court will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion of the Supreme Court, ubia supra.
For affirmance — Trenchard, Parker, Case, Donges, Brogan, Van Buskirk, Kays, Dear, Wells, Kerney, JJ. 10.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
162 A. 593, 109 N.J.L. 446, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 392, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothchild-v-abeles-nj-1932.