Rothblatt v. Nedry

373 So. 2d 404, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15229
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJuly 25, 1979
DocketNos. 77-1075, 77-1887
StatusPublished

This text of 373 So. 2d 404 (Rothblatt v. Nedry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Rothblatt v. Nedry, 373 So. 2d 404, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15229 (Fla. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The decedent was survived by his wife, and by two adult children from a former marriage. He bequeathed to his wife 50 per cent of his adjusted gross estate as finally determined for Federal estate tax purposes, and the residue to his children. The form, or language employed to make the bequest to the wife may be termed a standard, or formula marital deduction clause, except that it did not contain a phrase reducing the bequest by the value of property passing to the wife outside the will. The children petitioned the trial court to construe the will as though the missing phrase were not omitted, and appeal both a final judgment in favor of the wife and an order allowing the wife costs and attorney’s fee payable from the estate residue.

We find no error in the trial court’s construction of the will. King v. Citizens and Southern National Bank of Atlanta, Ga., 103 So.2d 689 (Fla. 3d DCA 1958); Estate of McLaughlin, 30 N.Y.2d 781, 334 N.Y.S.2d 175, 285 N.E.2d 318 (1972); New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary v. Lacy, 219 So.2d 665 (Miss.1969); Ganong v. Hauger, 239 Or. 483, 392 P.2d 187 (1965); In re Reben’s Will, Sur., 115 N.Y.S.2d 228 (1952). Cf. In re Estate of Rogers, 180 So.2d 167 (Fla. 2d DCA 1965). The trial court properly allowed fees to the wife’s attorneys. Section 733.106(3), Florida Statutes (1975); Johnson v. Burleson, 61 So.2d 170 (Fla. 1952); In re Estate of McCune, 223 So.2d 787 (Fla. 4th DCA 1969).

AFFIRMED.

CROSS, J., and LEFFLER, KENNETH M., Associate Judge, concur. DAUKSCH, J., concurs in conclusion only.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Estate of McCune
223 So. 2d 787 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Estate of Hauger v. Hauger
398 P.2d 187 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1965)
Ward v. Kidd
392 P.2d 183 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1964)
In Re Roger's Estate
180 So. 2d 167 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1965)
Johnson v. Burleson
61 So. 2d 170 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1952)
New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary v. Lacy
219 So. 2d 665 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1969)
King v. Citizens & Southern Nat. Bank of Atlanta, Ga.
103 So. 2d 689 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
In re the Estate of McLaughlin
285 N.E.2d 318 (New York Court of Appeals, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
373 So. 2d 404, 1979 Fla. App. LEXIS 15229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothblatt-v-nedry-fladistctapp-1979.