Rothberg v. Mayor & Aldermen of Jersey City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Rothberg v. Mayor & Aldermen of Jersey City

106 A. 892, 92 N.J.L. 632, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 229

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided March 3, 1919·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal involves the same fundamental question decided at the'present term in case No. 61 (Mayor and Aldermen of Jersey City v. John R. Hennessey, ante p. 606), and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the judgment herein on review is reversed, with costs.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This appeal involves the same fundamental question decided at the'present term in case No. 61 (Mayor and Aldermen of Jersey City v. John R. Hennessey, ante p. 606), and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the judgment herein on review is reversed, with costs.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 12.

Rothberg v. Mayor & Aldermen of Jersey City, 106 A. 892, 92 N.J.L. 632, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 229 (N.J. 1919).

Pincite

106 A. 892 (Rothberg v. Mayor & Aldermen of Jersey City) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.