Rothberg v. Mayor & Aldermen of Jersey City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Rothberg v. Mayor & Aldermen of Jersey City

106 A. 892, 92 N.J.L. 632, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 229

DecidedMarch 3, 1919

StatusPublished

This text of 106 A. 892 (Rothberg v. Mayor & Aldermen of Jersey City) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rothberg v. Mayor & Aldermen of Jersey City, 106 A. 892, 92 N.J.L. 632, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 229 (N.J. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal involves the same fundamental question decided at the'present term in case No. 61 (Mayor and Aldermen of Jersey City v. John R. Hennessey, ante p. 606), and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the judgment herein on review is reversed, with costs.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 12.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This appeal involves the same fundamental question decided at the'present term in case No. 61 (Mayor and Aldermen of Jersey City v. John R. Hennessey, ante p. 606), and for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in that case the judgment herein on review is reversed, with costs.

For affirmance — None.

For reversal — The Chancellor, Chief Justice, Swayze, Trenchard, Parker, Minturn, Kalisch, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Taylor, Gardner, JJ. 12.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

106 A. 892, 92 N.J.L. 632, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rothberg-v-mayor-aldermen-of-jersey-city-nj-1919.