Roth v. Way & Raymond

New York Supreme Court

Roth v. Way & Raymond

2 Hill & Den. 385

DecidedJanuary 15, 1842

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Hill & Den. 385 (Roth v. Way & Raymond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roth v. Way & Raymond, 2 Hill & Den. 385 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1842).

Pincite

Opinion

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

In actions commenced without writ, the filing and service of a declaration is in the natQre of process to bring the defendant into court, and the court always has power to see that its process is not abused. The defendants have been irregularly served with process purporting to issue out of this court, and it was not necessary for them to wait for a judgment or default before moving to set the proceedings aside.

Motion granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

By the Court,

Bronson, J.

In actions commenced without writ, the filing and service of a declaration is in the natQre of process to bring the defendant into court, and the court always has power to see that its process is not abused. The defendants have been irregularly served with process purporting to issue out of this court, and it was not necessary for them to wait for a judgment or default before moving to set the proceedings aside.

Motion granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Hill & Den. 385, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-v-way-raymond-nysupct-1842.