Roth v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Roth v. State

1931 OK CR 74, 296 P. 1117, 50 Okla. Crim. 253, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 120

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 21, 1931

DocketNo. A-7740.

StatusPublished

This text of 1931 OK CR 74 (Roth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roth v. State, 1931 OK CR 74, 296 P. 1117, 50 Okla. Crim. 253, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 120 (Okla. Ct. App. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Murray county on a charge of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

The case appears to have been rather poorly tried, and the record is not in good shape. No new question is presented. The evidence sustains the judgment, and no prejudicial error appears.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was convicted in the county court of Murray county on a charge of manufacturing intoxicating liquor, and was sentenced to pay a fine of $50 and to serve 30 days in the county jail.

The case appears to have been rather poorly tried, and the record is not in good shape. No new question is presented. The evidence sustains the judgment, and no prejudicial error appears.

The case is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1931 OK CR 74, 296 P. 1117, 50 Okla. Crim. 253, 1931 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-v-state-oklacrimapp-1931.