Roth v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roth v. State

263 A.D. 1062

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 25, 1942

DocketClaim No. 25302

StatusPublished

This text of 263 A.D. 1062 (Roth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roth v. State, 263 A.D. 1062 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent [1063]*1063and vote for reversal and for dismissal of the claim on the grounds as a matter of law there was no negligence upon the part of the State; as matter of law decedent was guilty of contributory negligence; and, in any event, decedent was at most a bare licensee. (The judgment awards damages for the death of claimant’s intestate resulting by reason of dangerous condition of swimming beach.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Crosby, P. J., and Taylor, J., who dissent [1063]*1063and vote for reversal and for dismissal of the claim on the grounds as a matter of law there was no negligence upon the part of the State; as matter of law decedent was guilty of contributory negligence; and, in any event, decedent was at most a bare licensee. (The judgment awards damages for the death of claimant’s intestate resulting by reason of dangerous condition of swimming beach.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 A.D. 1062, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-v-state-nyappdiv-1942.