Roth v. State

774 So. 2d 827, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16875, 2000 WL 1872806
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 27, 2000·No. No. 4D00-3707·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The order denying appellant’s post-conviction motion is hereby affirmed, without prejudice to his ability to pursue any available administrative or civil remedy. See, Trovillo v. Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement, 762 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).

WARNER, C.J., GUNTHER and STONE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roth v. State, 774 So. 2d 827, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16875, 2000 WL 1872806 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

774 So. 2d 827 (Roth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trovillo v. Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement
762 So. 2d 1038 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)