Roth v. State
774 So. 2d 827, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16875, 2000 WL 1872806
This text of 774 So. 2d 827 (Roth v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Roth v. State, 774 So. 2d 827, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16875, 2000 WL 1872806 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).
Opinion
The order denying appellant’s post-conviction motion is hereby affirmed, without prejudice to his ability to pursue any available administrative or civil remedy. See, Trovillo v. Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement, 762 So.2d 1038 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Trovillo v. Florida Dept. of Law Enforcement
762 So. 2d 1038 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
774 So. 2d 827, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 16875, 2000 WL 1872806, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.