Roth v. State

616 So. 2d 11, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 103, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 222, 1993 WL 22162
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 4, 1993·No. No. 80244·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Roth v. State, 601 So.2d 613 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992), based on certified conflict with Tarawneh v. State, 588 So.2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), review [12] denied, 598 So.2d 78 (Fla.1992), disapproved, Hayles v. State, 608 So.2d 13 (Fla.1992). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const. Based on Hayles, the decision below is approved.

It is so ordered.

BARKETT, C.J., and OVERTON, McDonald, shaw, grimes, kogan and HARDING, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roth v. State, 616 So. 2d 11, 18 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 103, 1993 Fla. LEXIS 222, 1993 WL 22162 (Fla. 1993).

616 So. 2d 11 (Roth v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tarawneh v. State
588 So. 2d 1006 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Roth v. State
601 So. 2d 613 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Hayles v. State
608 So. 2d 13 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1992)