Roth v. Perillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roth v. Perillo

9 A.D.2d 922, 195 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5518

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 21, 1959

StatusPublished

This text of 9 A.D.2d 922 (Roth v. Perillo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roth v. Perillo, 9 A.D.2d 922, 195 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5518 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for slander, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prae¡, rule 106, subd. 4). It is alleged that appellants said of respondent, Who has been engaged in the construction of buildings for over 35 years, that he was a “conniving” builder. No special damages are pleaded. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. j., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for slander, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prae¡, rule 106, subd. 4). It is alleged that appellants said of respondent, Who has been engaged in the construction of buildings for over 35 years, that he was a “conniving” builder. No special damages are pleaded. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Wenzel, Acting P. j., Beldock, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

9 A.D.2d 922, 195 N.Y.S.2d 613, 1959 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5518, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-v-perillo-nyappdiv-1959.