Roth v. Patino
270 A.D. 927, 62 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4690
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Martin, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Peck, JJ.; Cohn, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and the order and to deny the motion for judgment on the pleadings dismissing the complaint. [185 Misc. 235.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Roth v. Patino, 270 A.D. 927, 62 N.Y.S.2d 820, 1946 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4690 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).
270 A.D. 927 (Roth v. Patino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Roth v. Patino
185 Misc. 235 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)