Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Roth v. Pakstis

Roth v. Pakstis

13 A.D.3d 194, 785 N.Y.S.2d 917, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15363
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 16, 2004
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 13 A.D.3d 194 (Roth v. Pakstis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roth v. Pakstis, 13 A.D.3d 194, 785 N.Y.S.2d 917, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15363 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Paviola A. Soto, J.), entered October 1, 2003, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the brief, partially granted plaintiffs motion to compel discovery, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The grant of discovery in this matter was a proper exercise of discretion under CPLR 408, inasmuch as the data requested were material to the action (see Matter of Goldstein v McGuire, 84 AD2d 697 [1981]) and unavailable by other means. Concur— Williams, J.R, Marlow, Gonzalez, Sweeny and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

New York Independent Contractors Alliance v. Liu
43 Misc. 3d 443 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)
Smilow v. Ulrich
11 Misc. 3d 179 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 A.D.3d 194, 785 N.Y.S.2d 917, 2004 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-v-pakstis-nyappdiv-2004.