Roth v. Nissim Sabat, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Roth v. Nissim Sabat, Inc.

34 A.D.2d 939, 311 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4409

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 23, 1970

StatusPublished

This text of 34 A.D.2d 939 (Roth v. Nissim Sabat, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Roth v. Nissim Sabat, Inc., 34 A.D.2d 939, 311 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4409 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1970).

Pincite

Opinion

Order entered February 24, 1970 granting plaintiff’s motion to punish defendant for contempt for failing to produce certain documents and to contingently strike defendant’s answer, and imposing a fine of $100 for defendant’s willful failure to comply with prior orders, and denying defendant’s cross-motion for a protective order is unanimously affirmed, with $75 costs and disbursements to respondent. The defendant has repeatedly flouted the court’s clear mandate and the fine assessed was warranted in the circumstances. The answer of the defendant is stricken and an accounting directed unless the defendant’s president appears, produces and makes available the books, records and documents as heretofore directed and submits to examination as previously ordered at Special Term, Part II, of the Supreme Court, New York County, on July 15, 1970, at 10 o’clock in the forenoon. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., McGivern, Markewich, Nunez and McNally, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered February 24, 1970 granting plaintiff’s motion to punish defendant for contempt for failing to produce certain documents and to contingently strike defendant’s answer, and imposing a fine of $100 for defendant’s willful failure to comply with prior orders, and denying defendant’s cross-motion for a protective order is unanimously affirmed, with $75 costs and disbursements to respondent. The defendant has repeatedly flouted the court’s clear mandate and the fine assessed was warranted in the circumstances. The answer of the defendant is stricken and an accounting directed unless the defendant’s president appears, produces and makes available the books, records and documents as heretofore directed and submits to examination as previously ordered at Special Term, Part II, of the Supreme Court, New York County, on July 15, 1970, at 10 o’clock in the forenoon. Concur — Capozzoli, J. P., McGivern, Markewich, Nunez and McNally, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

34 A.D.2d 939, 311 N.Y.S.2d 787, 1970 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-v-nissim-sabat-inc-nyappdiv-1970.