Roth v. New Jersey

414 U.S. 962, 94 S. Ct. 271, 38 L. Ed. 2d 210, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1082
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 23, 1973·No. No. 72-1524·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinions

Super. Ct. N. J. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, [963]*963413 U. S. 15 (1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U. S. 115 (1973); United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139 (1973); Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483 (1973); Roaden v. Kentucky, 413 U. S. 496 (1973); and Alexander v. Virginia, 413 U. S. 836 (1973). Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that state obscenity regulation is prohibited by the Fourteenth and First Amendments (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certiorari and reverse judgment of conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roth v. New Jersey, 414 U.S. 962, 94 S. Ct. 271, 38 L. Ed. 2d 210, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1082 (1973).

414 U.S. 962 (Roth v. New Jersey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related