Roth v. New Jersey

414 U.S. 962, 94 S. Ct. 271, 38 L. Ed. 2d 210, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1082
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 23, 1973
DocketNo. 72-1524
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 414 U.S. 962 (Roth v. New Jersey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roth v. New Jersey, 414 U.S. 962, 94 S. Ct. 271, 38 L. Ed. 2d 210, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1082 (1973).

Opinions

Super. Ct. N. J. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Miller v. California, [963]*963413 U. S. 15 (1973); Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49 (1973); Kaplan v. California, 413 U. S. 115 (1973); United States v. 12 200-Ft. Reels of Film, 413 U. S. 123 (1973); United States v. Orito, 413 U. S. 139 (1973); Heller v. New York, 413 U. S. 483 (1973); Roaden v. Kentucky, 413 U. S. 496 (1973); and Alexander v. Virginia, 413 U. S. 836 (1973). Mr. Justice Douglas, being of the view that state obscenity regulation is prohibited by the Fourteenth and First Amendments (see Paris Adult Theatre I v. Slaton, 413 U. S. 49, 70 (Douglas, J., dissenting)), would grant certiorari and reverse judgment of conviction.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
414 U.S. 962, 94 S. Ct. 271, 38 L. Ed. 2d 210, 1973 U.S. LEXIS 1082, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-v-new-jersey-scotus-1973.