Roth v. Mutual Life Insurance

239 A.D. 798

This text of 239 A.D. 798 (Roth v. Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Roth v. Mutual Life Insurance, 239 A.D. 798 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Respondent having consented thereto in open court, an order will be made discontinuing this appeal upon the following terms: That the facts in the complaint in the California action may be pleaded as a defense and counterclaim in the New York action to recover disability benefits, with the same force and effect as if originally pleaded, with right in respondent to plead any other defense in said action it may be advised; defendant’s said counterclaim, being for equitable relief, is to be tried first; appellant to file within five days from the service of a copy of the order herein a stipulation consenting to discontinue the appeal upon the above terms. In the event that such stipulation is filed, the California action will be stayed. If appellant fail to file such stipulation, the judgment is unanimously affirmed, with costs. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Seudder, JJ. Settle order on two days’ notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 A.D. 798, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/roth-v-mutual-life-insurance-nyappdiv-1933.