Roth v. Meyer

248 A.D.2d 1001, 670 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3077
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 13, 1998·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

—Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: In support of his motion for a discretionary change of venue, defendant failed to set forth the complete addresses of prospective witnesses and their occupations and to describe the testimony he expected each of those witnesses to provide (see, Zinker v Zinker, 185 AD2d 698; see also, Abbadonza v Brown, 186 AD2d 1011). Thus, it was an improvident exercise of discretion for Supreme Court to grant the motion (see, O’Brien v Vassar Bros. Hosp., 207 AD2d 169, 171-172; see also, Pillittere v Ted & Ann Tours, 244 AD2d 1006). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Steuben County, Scudder, J. — Venue.)

Present — Denman, P. J., Hayes, Balio, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Roth v. Meyer, 248 A.D.2d 1001, 670 N.Y.S.2d 149, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3077 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

248 A.D.2d 1001 (Roth v. Meyer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Rowland v. Slayton
2019 NY Slip Op 1007 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Davis v. Firman
53 A.D.3d 1101 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Cintas Corp. v. Pontiac-Honda
256 A.D.2d 1094 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)